Elite Subscriptions – $9.95 a month and other details!

UPDATE:
Flagship Studios’ Lee Dotson has clarified the differences between subscribing and non-subscribing accounts:

Free Play

  • Does have customer support but it isn’t 24/7 premium customer support. Being ‘just an artist’ I don’t know all the specifics here.
  • Can play with elite players in all areas of the game that come with the shipped game but not in new areas added post launch.
  • Can not use ‘elite’ items. It should be noted that elite items are not more powerful/unbalanced items but rather have flashier appearances or simply new items that still fit in the overall balance scheme.
  • Includes patching/balance updates. (in case that’s not obvious)
  • On the same secure servers as ‘elite’ players.

Elite

  • Regular content updates, small ones every month and large ones every three months. (ie. new quests, dungeons, weapons, monsters, etc. that can only be accessed by elite players.)
  • Elite content will access higher
  • Can create guilds.
  • 24/7 Cust. Supp.
  • More character slots/larger shared stash
  • Additional play modes, hardcore, pvp, rp, etc..
  • Hopefully there will never be server ques but -if- there are then elites get priority.

If you’ve questions or comments, be sure to share them in the forum!
– Scapes

Original Post Follows:

The latest issue of Games for Windows Magazine has revealed the elite subscription pricing behind Hellgate: London, which will be free to play online should you opt out of subscribing for additional features. These features, which will be available for $9.95 (depending on location) are as follows:

  • Elite subscribers pay $9.95 a month
  • 24/7 phone- and internet-support
  • No (server) queues for elite subscribers, with preference over non-paying customers
  • 3 chars per account for non-elites, 12 for elite-customers
  • Elite subscribers can store up to 40 items (instead of 20 for non-subscribers), which can be accessed from any char in an account-wide item vault.
  • Visible distinction from other players. Elite subscribers are recognisable from their equipment and may trade subscriber-only equipment to other elite subscribers.
  • VIP-Shuttles to remote areas
  • Housing and founding of guilds are enabled for subscribers. Elite subscribers may attain officer/leader priviledges within their guild.
  • Elite subscribers have access to additional game modes, including Hardcore mode.
  • Elite subscribers and non-subscribers can play with each other.
  • Costs actually depend on where you live. Subscription fees in the Asian market will cost considerably less, in accordance to the market conditions and expectations of the players and local publishers within the region.

The subscription costs make it possible for Flagship Studios to produce additional content for Hellgate: London twice a month, or more. New content includes new items, monsters, areas, character classes and other content which are not present in the retail version of the game. It is not known as this time whether this additional content will only be available to paying subscribers. Discuss!

87 Comments

  1. Scapes May 8, 2007 4:25 pm  Reply

    Thanks for covering news-reporting duties for me, Sol!

    Driving my friend back to the airport and all.

  2. eat. sleep. game. post? May 8, 2007 8:21 pm  Reply

    [...] made subscription benefits enticing enough that a good number of players are going to be jumping onboard the subscription train: * Elite subscribers pay $9.95 a month * 24/7 phone- and internet-support * No (server) queues for [...]

  3. Nordri May 9, 2007 12:59 am  Reply

    Haha, you think you’re an MMO. Thats funny… stick with the single player/mp build… you had me interested at first

  4. Jonaz May 9, 2007 6:26 am  Reply

    Well, this might be the ultimate reason not to buy this game. Saved alota money.

  5. Roleplayers Blog » Blog Archive » Hellgate: Details zum kostenpflichtigen Multiplayer May 9, 2007 6:29 am  Reply

    [...] Neben einem 24-Stunden-Support und der Garantie beim Server-Login nicht warten zu müssen, erhalten Elite-Abonnenten darüber hinaus auch im Spiel Vorteile. So dürfen unter anderem 40 statt 20 Gegenstände gespeichert und 12 statt drei Charaktere betrieben werden. Häuser, Gilden und VIP-Shuttles, die die zahlende Kundschaft in sonst nicht zugängliche Gebiete bringen, gehören ebenso zum Umfang. Eine komplette (englische) Übersicht aller Leistungen finden Sie auf Hellgate Guru. [...]

  6. Sille May 9, 2007 7:40 am  Reply

    Well, you have a frist class and second class society. Anno domini, this was normal. You buy a first class, second class or third class ticket for a train. Today, we have first and second class, but these two classes are more similarly than Hellgate London with these radically separation.

    I hope, this system will have no success.

  7. Sei May 9, 2007 7:43 am  Reply

    The game looked interesting, it is however not a MMO but more akin to DIABLO. I think I will pass on the game now, 10 a month seems a bit too much.

    Maybe if you charged “considerably less, in accordance to the market conditions and expectations of the players” like you plan to do in Asia, we could arrive at a fair price.

  8. Are you Elite? at What Would Matt Do May 9, 2007 7:58 am  Reply

    [...] they mean, are you willing to pay $10 a month to have your game be cooler than the plebes? Details follow: * Elite subscribers pay $9.95 a month * 24/7 phone- and internet-support * No (server) [...]

  9. Hellgates second class citizens « Crowd Control May 9, 2007 8:27 am  Reply

    [...] this is that I misread the recent announcement about their pricing structure over at Hellgate guru (handy link) and I thought that they were using a MMO monthly subscription structure. Instead it seems they are [...]

  10. Nodhead May 9, 2007 9:12 am  Reply

    hmm i thin i will just go a bit more often to the cinema than buying hg:l with this half mp part and even without lan. ah screw it. you can keep the game fss.

  11. Chris May 9, 2007 10:13 am  Reply

    It sucks to have a “peasant” class, but to be fair, charging this fee will allow new content to come out, and also provide financial support for mp. You really can’t expect 50 people to work for free. You get what you pay for, and free stuff generally sucks. Nothing is worse than a great game with terrible mp support, just look at Company of Heroes. There is plenty you can do as a non-elite, and if you really become so invested that you want to be a guild leader, I think $9.95 is not much to pay. I think Flagship made an error in how this elitist policy will reflect on the reputation of the game (encouraging the feeling that most people are “missing out on something”), but there is certainly nothing unfair about wanting to make money. I’d rather pay $9.95 for a great game than have a mediocre free one. At least that is my opinion.

  12. Max May 9, 2007 10:58 am  Reply

    $9.95???
    With Age of Conan, Warhammer online coming I think only a mad will waste its money$ with this.
    You fail.
    No way i’ll buy this game.

  13. Sean May 9, 2007 11:45 am  Reply

    Are all you people that say this sucks or they won’t get the game missing the big point here?

    This is not a MMORPG … it is a single player game. You don’t have to play it online; It is not WoW or GW.

    However, if you MIGHT want to play online, it’s, now get this, FREE! You can play with both sets of players.

    And, if you wait five months and start the service, you get ALL OF THE CONTENT that was released in those past five months!

  14. Objulen May 9, 2007 1:08 pm  Reply

    Gripe, gripe, gripe, gripe.

    Seriously, you don’t have to pay to play. Given the cost of servers and bandwidth, and the staff they are keeping on call, a fee of some sort isn’t all that unreasonable for some extra stuff. Plenty of different places have something like this, including most file download sites like Fileplanet or Fileshack.

    To put it simply, you pay for extra goodies, not to play. You don’t want the goodies? Fine, don’t pay. If Hellgate doesn’t get enough elite subscribers, they’ll eliminate the service or lower the cost, and then maybe more people will jump on board. Remember folks, this is a buisness. They have costs to cover, and they are here to make money; would you rather not have the option of getting the extra content/goodies that the elite plan has at all?

  15. Boembi May 9, 2007 2:20 pm  Reply

    Ok, first i was like “wtf this shit sucks! this gives the VIPs a huge imbaness!”
    after readig it again there are only two things i really dislike:
    - 3 characterslots just are insufficient
    - if the VIPs get new (harder) dungeons and new (harder) monsters the new items would have to be more powerful, right? so VIPs get better equipment than free-players.

    i really dont care about 24h support or glow effects or stuff like that but you should keep the balance. i think nobody wants to play a game where others get advantages over you for spending (rL-)money.
    in other words, the multiplayer part will suck if you dont pay, so you will loose a lot of potential customers.

    my idea: as free-player ypu can choose to play either on the VIP server, together with the VIPs, or on a “free-only” server where they can play without the fear of beeing disadvantaged.

    l00k @ my id3a itz t3h g00d!!!!!1!11111

  16. d24e May 9, 2007 3:44 pm  Reply

    Boembi, read this dev response again plz:

    It should be noted that elite items are not more powerful/unbalanced items but rather have flashier appearances or simply new items that still fit in the overall balance scheme.

    So elites get some new zones, monsters and items with improved graphics. Big whoof! That won’t make them have any real advantage over the rest. They just get some more options to have fun with.

  17. Saint May 9, 2007 6:33 pm  Reply

    >Big whoof! That won’t make them have any real advantage
    >over the rest.

    This is how it starts.

  18. Fail May 9, 2007 6:58 pm  Reply

    >> Elite subscribers have access to additional game modes, including Hardcore mode.

    So, I have to pay $10 a month for a gamemode that should be free to play online? BRILLIANT!

    Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll stick with other games that give that to me without the fee. I wouldn’t mind paying for the additional space, but don’t cut modes just to get that from me.

  19. SuperS May 9, 2007 7:08 pm  Reply

    I think having a free play is an awesome idea. I’m not normally into MMO games mainly because you have to pay to play, which I find annoying and expensive. I know this isn’t a MMO, but it still has online features and it is good to know us cheapskates out there can still access them.

  20. Objulen May 9, 2007 7:30 pm  Reply

    >>So, I have to pay $10 a month for a gamemode that should be free to play online? BRILLIANT!

    And how did you come to the conclusion that it should be free? Developing content takes time, which costs money. Providing a greater degree of services and bandwidth costs money as well (for example, elite members can jump to the head of server lines, i.e. preferential access to bandwidth).

    While free content is nice, making it is not. Paying to play online isn’t mandatory, and there’s no reason to gripe about supporting the company that is enhancing the game that you play (unlike Diablo II, which had an expansion, and that’s it).

  21. GoldenChicken May 9, 2007 10:16 pm  Reply

    maintaining any game content and ensuring that content is fresh and exciting is a daunting and expensive task for any game development company..

    I would think that it is hard to realise this until you actually work in a game development company. Not that I have but it isn’t hard to realize that you need to put bread on the developers’ table.

    Hence, rather than to go all negative about this biz model, why dun you applause this model which effectively promotes game community and yet provide hardcore gamers with what they wan..

    juz my view anyway…

  22. Dax May 10, 2007 12:03 pm  Reply

    I seem to remember EQ Legends server that did a similiar pay structure and it eventually failed to.

    Keep in mind that the $9.95 value is a bit steep for not being a true MMO. I would consider cutting it by at least half or more. As a game player I can not afford to every month subscription price tht the gaming market wants to impose upon me. This leads me to having to choose one over the many out there.

    I will probably still get this game, but I will be one of the peasants if I choose to play it online.

  23. Was Going To Buy This May 10, 2007 3:58 pm  Reply

    Hey, you just lost a sale. Just thought I’d let you know.

  24. Once Interested HGL Fan May 11, 2007 8:28 am  Reply

    I’m paying 10 bucks to play Guild Wars is that what you’re saying?

    Because it sure sounds like it. Ten dollars per month for an outpost where i can see my avatar. LOL.

    Ten dollars to play in a party of five? Even Diablo 2 supported 8 players and we play for free on Battle net.

    No thank you, i wouldn’t even buy HGL now.

  25. BacteriaEP May 13, 2007 10:36 am  Reply

    My god…you guys are so whiny. I am glad there were a lot of you who are now refusing to play this game because of an optional “elite” mode. Its encouraging to know that I’m not going to have to suffer through the “WoW” crowd.

    More to the point, I like the new system they have set up. I can buy the game, play through it and dabble in the online world completely free. Then whenever I feel like it I can decide to buy into the elite mode and get access to all of the new content. I don’t know why some people think the devs should be working on new content to be released for free. No other online game does it. Even Guild Wars only adds new content in the form of a new expansion. But then again a lot of people are also idiots…

    P.S. Also D2 Hardcore mode was awesome, can’t wait to try it here! DON’T CHANGE A THING!

  26. entr0py May 15, 2007 2:23 am  Reply

    I’m all in favor of new content post launch. And the developers deserve to be somehow payed for it. But to limit players who ‘only’ bought the retail game to half the item slots and one quarter of the character slots is just absurd. People who were looking forward to a game with free multi-player will be so pissed off by this that I really think it will hurt their sales.

    What I wish they’d do is something like the system used in Battlefield 2142. Once the developers finish a meaningful amount of new content, you can choose to buy the booster pack online for $10. This may not seem like a lot of profit for them, but you’ve got to keep in mind that when you buy a $50 boxed game, much of that goes to materials, shipping and retailers. Whereas online sales are pure gravy for them.

  27. meh, a real pity June 4, 2007 10:11 pm  Reply

    RE: BacteriaEP,
    Then whenever I feel like it I can decide to buy into the elite mode and get access to all of the new content.

    Only so long as you KEEP paying. There was recently an interview http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76203 where Bill Roper pretty much says (minus all the ribbons and gloss making it sound nicer than it really is, but then again he has to put it that way so he doesn’t alienate people outright) that they are specifically making it so that you cant simply join for a month and use the benefits. And that once time runs up, they essentially take back EVERYTHING you got in that time, and tell you that you are not allowed to use any of it again until you cough up more dough. This also includes any characters, items, area’s, and really everything else you come across in that last month (cept levels, although apparently those seem to be capped for the limited version if I read it correctly, which would likely mean you might lose those as well until you pay up some more). So if you were 53 and your subsription goes by-by, and guess what?!?! You just reverted back 13 levels until you pay more money!!!

    Now dont get me wrong, I fully support paying people to keep things updated, but what I dont like is how MUCH they plan on charging, or how as people have pointed out, how a large part of their strategy is to taunt non paying characters with what they dont have. Its like waving a tenderloin steak in front of a starving child, I mean come on.

    I do feel that the gaming market is becoming a lot less friendly, and FAR more about making a quick buck rather than creating something fun and enjoyable (now adays things only happen to be fun and enjoyable BECAUSE it has to be to get people to cough up more money over prolonged periods). And so YES I am willing to pay for a subscription, but NOT when its 10$. I mean within the first year you have effectively purchased the game 3 and 1/5 times, which as someone mentioned, is almost all profit (dont have to pay for packing or any of that stuff except the initial payment to buy the box). So I can only beg that they be reasonable about their pricing and not simply following in WOW’s cruel footsteps of simply milking people for as much money as possible (if you actually go look at how much it would cost to keep WOW running, paying for ppl to create new content, maintain servers and all that, you can see that they are charging a massive amount more money the for what they actually provide. Like I think the break even point for Blizzard would be something in the range of $1-4, instead of the 15 they charge (which they also have not lowered even with its success), further implying their only real goal is profits.

    Seeing an honorable game company now a days is getting harder and harder to find. And it doesn’t look like it will change with Hellgate, although admittedly its not as bad as WOW, so it still seems to atleast have the potential for better.

    In summary (ahahah) $10 a month is a tad too steep.

  28. EcK June 7, 2007 12:48 pm  Reply

    i could pay 4-5 a month, but come on, 10 is like playing wow, it’s just too much

  29. Heard of Planetside? June 11, 2007 3:30 am  Reply

    Everything said so far sounds so-so, but soecial VIP shuttles to remote areas? How does that promote equal gameplay if VIPs will have to wait for regulars to hot foot it to an area to begin playing. Will there be mounts? lol.

  30. JoerT July 7, 2007 4:50 am  Reply

    A system very similar to this worked perfectly for a MMORPG called Tibia (www.tibia.com). Fees there are only slightly lower there, and the quality of the game is very bad indeed. I’ve played it, and you will really _want_ to pay to be able to be ahead of the rest, or even, not behind the rest.
    I like the concept.

  31. Arreat July 8, 2007 8:24 pm  Reply

    I think 9.95 a month is a fair price. Diablo 2 was free and it took a year and half for patch 1.10!! I know you might as well play a game like WoW or something for 15 a month, but for individuals like me who work, and have classes, this game is perfect! I would rather have a game that I don’t have to spend 1000′s of hours playing to cap out and raid. I want a game where I can log on and log off, similar to guild wars. The 9.95 a month will allow for more updates, than Guild Wars hopefully and it should be great!

  32. Kraenor July 10, 2007 6:49 am  Reply

    I think what people fail to realize is that paying a monthly subscription is probably the least expensive form of entertainment…ever. You have television (with cable), you will probably watch less of that than you do actually playing a game, and you spend about 30-50 dollars a month for that. Now, if you don’t have cable you get some shitty basic cable which you still have to pay for in taxes. People are so against paying 10 dollars for extra features in a video game, but will pay 30-50 for television that they probably use less.

    Now, let’s say you and your girlfriend/boyfriend go to movie and a dinner. The movie tickets alone will cost you more than the 10 dollars for that 1 month.

    You have to realize…no online game is truely free, nothing in life is free. Name me one free onlien game and I will tell you how your argument fails. On xbox you pay 8.99 a month for xbox live and STILL have to pay extra for content upgrades on video games. Battlefield 2142, you need to buy the content upgrades or you wont be able to play with your friends on new map, Guiildwars you need to by an expansion which is 30 dollars every time or you won’t be able to play with people you want.

    People, you don’t even realize the extent of the elite account. There is no major difference besides a few character and inv slot, with the privledge to make guilds (which is a good thing because guild leaders should be commited to the game anyway, so if they’re paying they are commited =P.) They will have no distinct advantage over you where they will be able to kill you when you’re 10 levels above them, or anything absurd for that matter. Go make an incredible online game and charge no money to play it, please. I want to see you all fail.

  33. Johhny P July 10, 2007 7:49 pm  Reply

    OMFG, i dont see what the big fuss is!
    its only 10$ a month! like wow 120$ a year, thats fuckin nothing, people spend 300-500 dollars on gyms memberships which they only go like one a month to. like wow, i just made enough to cover like a 2 year subscription in 2 days. i think you guys, the people that are complainging so much, get a life, and maybe a job to boot. also, its free! you can choose to pay monthly, but other than that its free. and honestly, there is going to be so many people online its not even funny. they’ve polled that over 90% of WoW players will be changing over to hellgate the RELEASE DATE! and like Kraenor said, “nothing in life is free”. but know what, atleast flagship is trying to give u a better experience of the game at an affordable and fair price, but also allows a player to play for free. Unlike other RPGs that seem to be free but u end up having to go and buy an expansion at the store,which ends up being another box/case takin up space that you will not need after installing, they automatically update free of charge! it is just that when u subscribe that u will get added dungeons, weps and monsters that only elite members can access added ontop of those updates.

    People will not work for free. how do u think the server admins and the GMs governing over all PCs will get paid. i can bet that a good chunk of people that are complaining play MMORPGs on private/cracked servers. if so think this, do you not get items, money, equips, and character mods if you donate a certain amount to the server? and WoW, they do not even give u the option of free online. Also, if you want to get the elite membership, IT IS CHEAPER THAN WOW!

    so i say suck it up. and atleast wait untill it comes out before you start gutting the shit out of it.

    just my 2 cents

  34. Kraenor July 12, 2007 6:20 pm  Reply

    There’s no way that 90% of the WoW population will be leaving for this game, no way in hell, but I’d imagine a pretty good portion (Maybe even as high as 15-20%) would. A lot more will probably head over to Age of conan and especially Warhammer. We’d get more of the Diablo players that never hgot into WoW, and a few others. But all in all this game looks amazing, despite the monthly fee, but knowing who the creators are, the guys behind Diablo, I’d gladly pay the 10 dollars a month for an elite account if this is, as it will be, Diablo on crack.

  35. ceq July 13, 2007 8:31 am  Reply

    Sorry, but are you guys nuts!?
    Simply read the whole text again…

    Elite-users have more storage room.
    The “new” stuff is NOT more powerful than the normal stuff.
    If you want more stuff, you pay to pay. Nothing else than f.e. Warrock or Dungeon Runners.

    It’s a normal SP/MP-Game, but without LAN. That’s a shame, but cheating becomes more difficult, so I’m fine with it.

    You DO NOT have to pay. You can play for free online.
    So, what’s wrong with you?

  36. Sam Baker August 17, 2007 7:52 am  Reply

    As a 16 year old with no real source of income, im initially freaked. I’m saving up all my money for a game that will cost who knows how much money(hopefully no more than $50) and now I have to pay $10 a month to get over level 40 or play in certain game modes? But then I realized, hey, it’s better than WoW by $5, and it’s an overall better game. Not to mention, i usually get a new game every 2 months or so anyway, and if I ask my parents to just pay for a subscription instead, so much the better. But they should at least have a discount for bulk ordering, like 1 year for only $100. Oh, and 30 days for $10 is finding about 35 cents on the ground everyday, or asking a friend for a dime, and another friend a quarter.

  37. F2Psucks August 17, 2007 2:55 pm  Reply

    f2p models always do bad, most asian MMO games follow the free 2 play model and require you to pay for additional features

    just make it p2p (pay to play)
    or
    make it f2p (free to play)

    nobody wants a half-assed subscription model

  38. LemonJoose August 23, 2007 8:34 pm  Reply

    My prediction about the ramifications of the 2-tiered peasant/elite strategy as opposed to just making the best game possible with no subscription fee separating the player base into two classes:

    1) Maybe 5% of the original potential audience likes the idea, because they’ll get off in some way by flaunting their “elite” status to the peasants. That 10% buys the game and happily pays their membership fee to be a cool elitist.

    2) 75% of the original potential audience hates the idea, and realizes there are other games they can buy in this genre where they do not have to pay an extortion fee to avoid being part of the peasant class. This 75% says “Screw this, I’ll go play Diablo 2/Guild Wars/Guild Wars 2/TitanQuest/Sacred/Sacred 2, etc.” Furthermore, they realize that by saving the $170 it would cost them to play HGL in the first year, they can actually play pretty much all of these other games FOREVER without feeling like they are a peasant. Or buy 3.5 brand new games of their choice and play them FOREVER without feeling like they are a peasant.
    This 75% which would have bought the game decides not to buy the game.

    3) 20% of the potential audience are clueless and buy the game off the shelf because it looks cool. They are not aware that the game will make them feel like a peasant unless they pay the monthly extortion fee. When they find this out they are pissed off, quit playing the game, and swear to never buy another Flagship title ever again.

    I hope for Flagship’s sake that the money they get from only 25% of the initial sales they would have had, plus the monthly fees from 5% of the original potential audience adds up to more profits. It really all depends on how long that 5% decides to keep paying the monthly extortion fee.

  39. Dark_Mark September 1, 2007 9:52 pm  Reply

    It seems to me as thought everyone is overlooking the elephant in the room as to why the “elite” package is so superior. TO PLAY PVP YOU HAVE TO BE AN ELITE. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, IT DOES NOT COST THAT MUCH MONEY TO MAINTAIN SERVERS, AND DEMANDING MONTHLY FEES IS OUTRAGEOUSLY MORE COSTLY TO THE CONSUMER THAN OFFERING DOWNLOADS/EXPANSION PACKS ON AN A LA CARTE BASIS WHERE THEY ARE NOT NECESSARY, BUT NICE TO HAVE. Really, I REFUSE to pay money for such an elementary game mode as pvp, and would refuse to do so on principle alone, and I consider pvp combat to be an rpg staple. Needless to say, if the current subscription model remains intact, I will not be buying this game. There are too many other games coming out that don’t intend to extort money out of me for BASIC game features.

  40. Ronald September 2, 2007 10:57 am  Reply

    Seriously, paying for hard mode? We have to pay them to increase the monster’s hitpoints or something? Paying for extra content, etc. I understand but game modes? PvP should be free too, I mean EVERY RPG has PvP. I’ll buy the game though since I don’t like PvP, I doubt anyones going to pay for Elite when that money can go to something better.

    Subscriptions tend to make me feel that I HAVE to play the game since I’ve paid for the month already. I know that I can stop the subscription but say I want to play again? Its a hassle to start the subscription, etc.

  41. Hellgate London Beta - Sept 17 - Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board September 6, 2007 2:57 am  Reply

    [...] Originally Posted by Azrayne The $10 will go towards providing a more stable, cheat free environment and working on new content for the game. Jesus, it’s not like it’s much money, you can spend $10 on a burger/fries/coke at McDonalds, once a month is basically nothing. Online play is available without paying the monthly fee. More info on “elite” vs normal accounts. [...]

  42. ShockWave September 12, 2007 3:28 am  Reply

    Hi.
    1st of ALL i Don’t play pay per play or monthly charges games.
    i am finding that this game will follow the foot steps of games like guild wars & archlord which now have no monthly fees.

    i was under the impression for the last 2 yrs until today that this would be a FREE online game & basically a mix of diablo mixed with a FPS type game.
    I REFUSE to pay monthly charges for ANY game including this 1 & am finding that this “practice” of “monthly charges” will continue to plague ALL genres of games including FPS games.It’s obvious to me that dev’s/pub’s are milking us gamers for EVERY cent we own & there will come a point were ppl will just stop playing games & go back to basics like chess & checkers or maybe getting physical in some sport(s).

    My final thought is that if ppl continue to let themselves be bilked for their(or parents)hard earned $$$ then it’s our fault when free online gaming becomes a “myth”.
    Games used to be ALL about “user created” maps,mods,tracks,levels,cars,skins,models…..etc.
    What i see here is the DEATH of what made MP gaming “FUN” & exciting cause u got “BANG for ur BUCK” EVEN if u had to pay for expansion packs.
    I blame the downfall of free MP gaming on ALL the fools that have tooo much $$$ in their (parents) pockets to carelessly dishout $$ for games that should stay FREE.I pay enuff for my internet connection that i don’t need additional fees for my online gaming.

    1 more thing to the dude that said this “pay per play” model is cool & cheaper then watching/paying for TV>> YOU ARE A FOOL,i GET MORE then 1 channel when i watch TV which this game will NOT give me & if ur so FOOLISH to think that a few additional costumes & level designs in the past being free is worth a $10 monthly fee i hope u SLAVE to all the future play per play games of the rotten gaming future.

  43. Kirzan September 13, 2007 12:49 pm  Reply

    Difference with tibia my friend is that tibia has no boxed version that costs 50$ (im canadian so yeah 50 for me). I fully understand the concept as I work in the gaming industry, but 10 is too much, 5.99 would be more acceptable.

    To answer people comparing to wow, WoW, for me, as a Canadian, costs 18.70 or some shit like that, 14.99 taxes conversion. 9.95 is cheapcakes compared to it, and quite frankly, if you have a life this is more of a game I’d pay monthly for. MMOs are too much time commitment, when you work full time if you wanna get anywhere in an mmo you’ve got to sacrifice all those little hours you have for yourself in a day to it… I can’t do that. While on Hellgate London, I have a single player mode that seems interesting, I have a multiplayer mode that probably won’t need for me to put all those hours into it to see the good stuff.

    To sum it up, the only thing, ONLY thing that would make this monthly fee worth it is the actual content they add in a month… if they add a LOT, they’ve done their job and ill gladly give them 10 bucks. So a good way to make it easier for people who plan on going elite would be to post the “under dev.” page, you look at it, you see if stuff looks interesting and if it does, you pay. If it doesn’t you just keep being a peasant for a month or hell you just play the SP.

    You are not forced to pay, so stop crying.

  44. ShockWave September 14, 2007 3:22 pm  Reply

    I’am NOT CRYING,just pointing out that this monthly fee thing is gonna become a “normal” part of MP gaming.Games that normally SHOULDN’T have a fee will start charging fees because there are so many damn E-tards.Games like unreal,quake,rainbow six…etc will get the “bright” ideaR that E-tards have too much $$$ & they’ll eventually start charging $$$.

    ALL i want is for E-tards to WAKE UP !!! & stop the “home coin arcade” syndrome from becoming a nightmarish cash cow.

  45. re-con October 19, 2007 11:22 pm  Reply

    This sounds like a real pain in the ass. I really do hope that they seriously think about putting new content into an expansion so at least we have a choice as to whether we subscribe to play online or simply buy the expansion.

  46. Cilla October 20, 2007 3:18 pm  Reply

    What a pain!!!
    The demo was already very dissapointing but this Elite feeis the killer.
    So many people wont buy the game at all now, a split community is really crappy and you somehow wont get around to buying…
    Tag the tubewalls with ad or lower the fee…
    For FFSs sake.

  47. Cilla October 20, 2007 3:29 pm  Reply

    I forgot to mention the spyware… another reason why many people wont buy it…

  48. My god, you guys are idiots October 20, 2007 5:07 pm  Reply

    first of all, the level is capped at 50 for BOTH free players and elites, so they won’t be a higher level than anybody else.

    Second of all, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PAY, just wait until they decide to make a booster pack for free players or whatever they want to do.

    Third, you guys are telling me nearly 10 bucks is that hard to make?!?!

    Jesus Christ, I make more than that in a hour, I’m pretty sure if you’re 16 and older, you can find a job or if you can’t, get an allowance from your parents.

    It’s not exactly that hard compared with other MMO subscriptions, and to those people who compare this to Guild Wars, people get more content through either a new campaign or the new expansion pack, not through content updates.

    Which is better, campaigns/a expansion pack that are years apart, or ongoing content updates?

  49. Ydiss October 20, 2007 5:11 pm  Reply

    Haha. My word, $9.95 a month? Peanuts and you’re complaining. Fine, don’t buy the game (or download it, which is more likely considering the baulking at a measly $9.95 a month) and enjoy the free online content.

    Go play another game. Freedom of choice is a wonderful thing. But not quite as wonderful as earning a living and being able to afford a pitiful amount of money a month to enjoy some perks of what is looking to be a fantastic game.

    Seriously… lol… chuckling inside… $9.95! Haha!

  50. Ydiss October 20, 2007 5:19 pm  Reply

    And believe me, the non payers will benefit from the payers, mark my words. With subs coming in the servers will be funded (which is understandable as they’re looking to provide large servers) – so all those playing the game for free with have servers that are much more likely to be stable and reliable.

    Remove the subs model and suddenly they will have more excuses to offer a sub-standard service to everyone.

    The payers will deserve perks and the perks they get are fair.

    If you like the game, play it. If having an inferiority complex is likely to force your young mind to implode in a childish frenzy then feel free to impose your selfishness elsewhere.

  51. Diablo II Classic Player October 20, 2007 6:11 pm  Reply

    Hopefully Hellgate London developers are reading these posts…

    Most of my onling RPG playing comes from Diablo, so this might be weighted to how that game is run. Complaining about $9.95 isn’t about the amount that you’re paying, but rather the idea behind it. Paying monthly for new content at the rate it will supposedly be is understandable, however paying monthly just so you can duke it out with other players is outrageous. Does it really take enough effort to pit players against eachother that you would have to charge monthly? PvP is half of the game in my opinion, if not more.

    Online play is redundant if all you can do is use strategy or teamplay against AI that just adjust mathematically to compensate for your actions. In Diablo II, you can fight in teams against one another (for FREE might I add) using tactics that the enemy might not understand, and once they do, they adapt. When against the AI, you’re fighting the system with the system. Where’s the fun in that?

    Bottom line:

    I REFUSE to pay ANY sum of money, be it $.01 a year or the $9.95 a month that it is just so I can fight other players.

  52. Deleris October 21, 2007 8:13 pm  Reply

    So if u dont get elite u cant pvp? I hope not cause that completely ruins the game for me.

  53. tully October 22, 2007 10:28 am  Reply

    what a load of shite you wheez out this below par game and then expect people to play vast sums to play it. this is just a poor 3d version of diabalo II, I hope it fails hard

  54. Zibi October 23, 2007 12:29 pm  Reply

    Well, i think you pay for quality, this game looks rly nice and i dont mind paying 10$ so i can get new content and enjoy game to full. Come to think about it, 9mln ppl pay 15euro for WoW (including me :>) to just play it, you CAN pay twice less to get more and more conent, is that rly expnesive compared to other games and without comparing it to anything? 10$ isnt that much money.

  55. Gazbin October 25, 2007 7:06 am  Reply

    I have a pre-order and was not aware that a subscription is being pushed. Ive been playing the Beta and I thought the game was comming along OK but news of the monthly fee else your banished to crap class is not impressing me after spending AU$100.

    As a result I will call the store where I placed my preorder and cancell my purchase. Sad to hear it has ended this way.

    Cheers Gazbin (Level 14 Engineer)

  56. Eiji October 28, 2007 10:28 pm  Reply

    i’m sad to see all these whiners out here. for those that pit this subscription model against Guild Wars (for which i bought and played all expansions), FSS is NOT FORCING anyone to subscribe. Guild Wars updates content through expansion packs, while HGL expands through the subscription model (also hinted that they might bundle these updates into expansions for non-subscribers).

    second, refusing to play a game on principle of their partial subscription model is a childish action. if you dislike game genre, then don’t play. if you dislike the content, then don’t play. if the game is sub-par, then don’t play. but if they allow the OPTION of a subscription, then don’t refuse to play because of that feature. FSS isn’t expecting and requiring people to pay to play. they are hoping people will pay so that they can make money and provide content updates (expecting companies to not attempt to make money is ridiculous).

    finally, HGL is by no means a sub-standard game. you can not compare a beta or demo to other released and updated games. and while the gameplay style of HGL isn’t revolutionary (following the footsteps of diablo 2), gameplay isn’t the only factor that goes into a game. server stability, graphics, content, replayability, and even customer service are all important factors that go into a game, yet very few people acknowledge those when comparing games. to those that feel hardcore mode should be free, consider this. the founders of FSS are the core creators of diablo 2. you all owe hardcore mode to them. if they feel hardcore mode is a perk for subscribers only, that is their say, and i’m more inclined to agree with them than the average, uninformed gamer.

    ***PS*** $9.95 is a relatively low price. no gamer has the right to decide if games should be free. companies are the ones that decide how much to charge (you don’t go storming out of walmart when you find out food prices have gone up, you whine a bit and deal with it).

    to the person saying paying for TV gives you multiple channels, YOU CAN’T WATCH ALL THOSE CHANNELS AT THE SAME TIME. the comparison is hours of gaming fun vs. hours of T.V. fun, not channels of T.V. vs. modes of gameplay (that would make a batch of minigames the best “bang for the buck” choice).

  57. Lol October 30, 2007 2:07 am  Reply

    Haha. Oh man this whinning is priceless. Been laughing my fanny off. good stuff. ty all.
    One of my favorites
    ‘Paying monthly for new content at the rate it will supposedly be is understandable, however paying monthly just so you can duke it out with other players is outrageous’

    So its understandable, you just said it, and it also includes the pvp. So you get what you say you want, the new content, and the pvp and you still bitch. lol gg gg

    Also, wtf are any of you to say something should be free. Just about everything you do in life for entertainment cost something. And the biggest kicker of all from all the children crying is that they dont seem to grasp the concept that durpee freakin durr YOU DONT HAVE TO PAY!!!!! L to the O to the L. gg just dont buy the game. no reason to post here.

  58. Spooler October 30, 2007 7:37 am  Reply

    I will be encouraging clan members to get this game …

    HOWEVER ! I’m paying 90$ australian for this game and I get 3 slots online ? Haha nothing like encouraging people to crack the servers and make an emulator hey ?

    I don’t see this lasting very long before it gets completely cut this game had some serious potential online but now its going to get torrent’d to high hell which will cost the HGL team a hell of alot more than they could possibly make from a 9.95 monthly fee.

    to those of you saying “o but you don’t have to pay” Your right but 3 slots ? and a halved stash ? ok do me a favour give me the ability to buy an extra character slot for a one time fee of 5 bucks to get another character slot.

    ok so its saying it will cost me less as I live in the asain region … I wouldn’t mind betting it will cost me more to connect to a high ping server.

    I have a feeling this idea will be the downfall of HGL.

    Take a leaf from guildwars let me buy cool looking gear and character slots that don’t give me the visible label of “elite”
    and make everyone else second class.

  59. XxRogueXx October 30, 2007 3:46 pm  Reply

    i think you guys are being the biggest cheap skates out, big deal u have to pay 10-15 dollars thats like a meal outside every damn month, if its a game u enjoy it is worth it by far with the current price. think about it children.

  60. disgruntled October 30, 2007 4:41 pm  Reply

    well, i duno….d2 was great and the awesome part of it was not having to pay to play multiplayer. and how long has d2 been around?….exactly…and how much have they made?….exactly…even w/o charging a monthly. hell, i STILL play d2 after all these years….it was just that good. the depression of no d3 that has lingered all these years could have gone away…with the release of HGL, now that hope of a COMPLETE “d3″ that could compete with the greatness of d2 is long lost. sometimes i wonder how Roeper could turn his back on his d2 faithful.

    $10…. agreed, its too much for having a “different” online experience for not being a full MMO and the amount definitely needs to change. I didn’t make the move to WoW or any of the others for just the reason of havin to blow the $ to buy the game and then an exorbitant amount monthly so you get everything along with it? cmon now….overkill is overkill. Buying the game is enough and you should get what was intended with all whistles n gadgets……how bout a complete game?. Many other multiplayer games (oh and uh single player games too O.o … cough cough…. oblivion cough cough) have had no problem keeping their businesses afloat based on sales alone…and in actuality the fees kill most games nowadays because you end up buying the game multiple times a year when you should buy it once. the solution is solid games with LONGEVITY, which are few and far between nowadays.

    -disgruntled

  61. Dall3n November 1, 2007 11:06 pm  Reply

    What is this? 9,95/month? I’m 19 years old and work extra after school and I make that much in an hour, (even after taxes) and I work in a damn grocery store. I have beta tested this game and pre ordered and I can tell you, the item space isn’t that limited. You dont need the extra space. The items that elite players get is only a little cooler, not better. The level cap is the same for all players, paying or not. The charcter slots should maybe be four for non paying customers, but why would you need 12 characters? The three slots are enought for the three character classes.. Cabalists (Evoker and Summoner) Templars (Guardian and Blademaster) and Hunters (Marksman and Engineer). It is this way so that you can try all three classes without deleting a character. Even though I dislike the fact of monthly payment for a game, atleast this company is going in the right direction. You CAN play the game online without paying, it has a single player mode, the fee (if you decide to pay) is considerably smaller then other online games. You would have to order wow for an entire year atleast to get down to this games normal price. You may think that the price is much for the small bonuses you get but consider all the free things you get from them that other companies dont give. I would have to say that this game is really worth playing even if you dont pay the monthly fee. Also this is the first “real” game from Flagship, they have a game called Mythos which is really similar to diablo 2 but with a little refined graphics, and it will be a free to download and free to play game. They need to make a budget for their next game. I have to say they atleast have a good heart. Compared to Blizzard that makes roughly 100 million dollars/month on just the fees. No way in hell all the servers and personnel cost anything close to that.

    PS. This is a really good game

  62. Dall3n November 1, 2007 11:15 pm  Reply

    Btw disgruntled.

    You wouldnt happen to notice that the company that made diablo 2 is called bliszzard and that they sell alot of other games like starcraft and warcraft and nowadays wow. They have a HUMONGOUS budget. Also they get sponsored with servers, here in sweden Telia has the servers and they get good PR for that.

  63. Ryan November 3, 2007 1:08 pm  Reply

    My question, to someone that owns the game, is if i don’t want to pay a monthly fee, being a poor college student, is the rest of the game still worth buying?

  64. Stevez November 4, 2007 9:57 am  Reply

    10$ a month seems a little much for flashier weapons and some extra storage space. A lot of the people who will be playing HGL also play games like WoW where they’re already paying a monthly a fee. So in their minds they can either pay 25$ a month to play both games or just play one. HGL has gotten mixed reviews so when it comes down to “Do I really want to waste money on this game?” The answer is no. Maybe once the game picks up speed subscribing won’t seem nearly as “outrageous”.

    However $9.95 in general is just too much, take it down to $5.99 and you’d see a lot more subscriptions. Although it’s just a measly four dollars cheaper it seems like a lot less in the eyes of the consumer.

  65. Matt November 5, 2007 12:03 am  Reply

    In all fairness, they did a decent job trying to create the game.
    In all reality, everyone thinks the cash cow is to ask money for subscription service. For some games, its logical on a long-term basis. For games like Hellgate, absolutely not. If Flyff charged a monthly fee you’d see absolutely 0 players.

    If games give real reasons to give cash (wow’s community, EQ2′s player trading system), is one thing. But to gimp characters via pay/no pay is just a recipe for failure.

    As far as balance is concerned, try as you might to keep it balanced but if non-paying players cannot play at the same difficulty as paying players then balance is out the window. Perhaps at “equal levels players will be equal” but the concept of a level 95 versus a level 65 (because the 65 can’t do hard mode)….well, hmm, logic?

    Good bye diablo makers, you were great, and then you obviously let cash influence you instead of making the best game you could come up with. Definitely not paying and not referring to anyone I know, first mmo-style game I never even wanted to test the beta because it was so broken and rushed out.

    /salutes.

  66. Andrew November 5, 2007 1:07 am  Reply

    We live in a world driven by money soon enough all mmos will cost money, if you don’t like it tough go do something else.

  67. Robert Mugabi November 5, 2007 9:44 am  Reply

    I think these money grabbing bastids shouldnt be charging for something that can easily be given for free – like in guild wars.

    If anyone working for Hellgate reads this…

    MAKE IT FREE BECOME THE BIGGEST GAME OF 07 08 i’m sure my next comment will get censored – assholes – youve made enough money already

  68. diolo November 5, 2007 11:20 am  Reply

    wtf i must pay 9dollar shit game

  69. Oosh November 12, 2007 7:16 am  Reply

    hmmmm… I really cant decide if I should buy this game or not. If they announced that all the sub content will be mate available at a later date in stores as an expansion then I would buy it.

    If im going to miss out on alot of content like quests and new areas and key parts of the game like PVP and play modes then I dont think I will buy it.

    I think announcing that all sub content will eventually be made available as expansions in stores would pretty much fix everything but they need to make it official.

    Honestly would anyone here still be upset if the knew eventually all sub content will be available in expansions? even including things like extra character spots as part of the expansion? I cant think of people finding anything wrong with that and I can think of why it wouldnt make flagship even more money…

    They should announce it now and make everyone happy! The subbers get the content as soon as its made and the other people have the option of buying it grouped as expansions later in stores! you cant lose!

  70. Robin November 15, 2007 1:31 am  Reply

    Well not to complain one way or the other, but I can also give my thoughts about this.

    If a person wants to pay the 10 a month, more power to them for all the updates and extras, which I think is only fair. (4.99 a month sounds better to me and I would pay that).

    Anyways…
    I think Spooler made a nice suggestion
    “Your right but 3 slots ? and a halved stash ? ok do me a favor give me the ability to buy an extra character slot for a one time fee of 5 bucks to get another character slot.”

    I might not get to play the game every month or might just skip a month or two then come back to it.
    But to pay a monthly fee or lose the features which you were paying for just does not seem right.

    I do like the thought of paying 5.00 for extra characters.
    Also making another $5.00 one for a character to have double the inventory as well.

    Things that I think should be given for free are:
    PVP
    At least 3 more character slots. (so a person can at least make one of each class).

    Maybe even just make it simple and set it up with a package deal – where if you buy a new character with double the space for $10.00.

    Then if I want to play another new game that came out and went back to HGL my chars would still be preserved like they were when I took a time out.

    If anyone from HGL does read these, just think about the suggestions, for what they are just suggestions.

    But these can be also a way for HGL to make $$$ also… besides the subscribers monthly fees.

    I mean this could be the stop gap that is needed to make many of people happy to play your game, especially for the people who refuse to subscribe.
    Whether this being that it is against their principals or available income.

    In GW when I was into that I paid for 4 extra character slots.
    In oblivion I have every expansion they came out with.

  71. blaka November 19, 2007 4:13 pm  Reply

    if they come from diable (blizzard) why do they then make 10$ payment month for elite. Was they no against the system were u have to pay every month that why they did not join WOW and now they make this, not 100% the same but no pvp if u not have elite.

  72. blade December 3, 2007 6:05 am  Reply

    Cry Baby’s , About Paying a fee for Online , not a issue here 10.00 is better then like some game , when they first come out they charge 30.00 if it was a (MMO. lets see game looks great iv played WoW,GW’s,SWG,FFXI, Pretty much all MMO’s they Charge Same yet , you here can still play online Free yes so what you ont get Other Crap , they could of just made it Online Only & charged (15.00) a month yet its 9.99.

    About Chart Slot’s your kidding me Most game’s dont give you more then 2 , 3′s nice & more as Elite even Nicer.

    About Items/Guilds , Like Every Online Game if you Want More Content Pay the Monthly Fee , Beats going Buying a movie that you might buy for 19.99 that you wont like, Your Geting More , the people who are making Content do alot you know.

    About the Cust Support , 24/7 Pretty Nice not to Mention how many of you Idiot’s will mess your game up & Cry like a 2year Old , so 24/7 Support could be like some Game’s take’s 3days for some Support.

  73. nixy December 12, 2007 4:19 pm  Reply

    I dont see the problem
    the “elite” players pay X monthly so i dont have to pay slightly smaller X monthly to play. No problem.

    They get preetier stuff. My graphics card is lame, no amount of bragging/showing off in the world will make me notice.

    I dont get the whole peasent thing. Its a damn game, there new stuff apparently has no REAL advantage, and if anything, its more fun to PVP the crap outta a guy in shiny armour with a rusty spoon than it is shiny – shiny…

    Im still gettin it.

    And not a penny afterwards.

  74. TehRobbehSauce December 13, 2007 9:48 am  Reply

    This whole thread fails lol…. I ready maybe about half of the page, and found out that you guys are just repeating a bunch of crap over and over. Why is this thread continuing to even go on?. And I don’t think this thread will make anyone lower or free up prices on the game for something thats Optional. So if you don’t like, kill the QQing and just gtfo out of the thread :D

  75. Kilroneo December 28, 2007 7:04 pm  Reply

    Looked awesome!!! Even with this 10 bucks for the “better items”, “better monsters” and “better service” stuff. but the part that ruined it all was that both types of players played in the same servers.

    Its just a way for first class people to show of their stuff and totally beat the crude out of people in PvP games, but i guess its a main factor in trying to get people to pay for online…

    Now this game is dissappointing to two ways… —> ‘HG: L’ lost alot’of costumers

  76. Tatsuhoshi December 29, 2007 1:37 am  Reply

    First of all, most of you people are lamers. They are not REQUIRING a fee for anything. They are not LIMITING levels of anyone. So you have a little less inventory. That will just inspire the free players to trade items more or sell more stuff. The other ‘elite’ content IS NOT superior, it is flashier. Whoopty-F’ing-doo…. I can live with a little less bling than the other guy, can you? If not, then you are even more lame. WoW, Guild Wars, and many other innumerable MMORPGs do not have SINGLE-PLAYER MODE at all. So what if you don’t have hardcore mode. Even if you don’t play it online, you have an offline you can play. Want to waste some time with some friends, hop on the FREE servers and go beat the crud out of monsters. Perhaps you are playing online and come across a mission that is too difficult alone. You can still ask for help, even from the paying members. So where’s the problem? There isn’t one. Stop making up crap about a game you’ve not even played, or perhaps had the advantage of beta-ing for free, and argue with facts or don’t argue at all.

    Facts: The game is free. There are no level-cap differences. Paying members will look flashier. You can’t get the crud beat out of you if you aren’t paying, so you don’t lose your precious exp, items, gold, levels, stuff in general to some jack who has no life and lives on the game because he has no real life. Free players get access to just as many character slots as most games people have to pay for. 20 items is not a number easily scoffed at…why would you want to horde much more than that, and why are you hording items you aren’t using anyway?

  77. Infernitorn January 2, 2008 5:46 pm  Reply

    I just find it funny, looking at some of the comments “Why pay for this when you can get this for that,” but then you look at those situations, and its exactly the same.

    Sure HGL isnt a “True” MMO, but after playing the “peasant” online mode i can say that its structured MMO style is amazing. You play with a party that you want to play with. No absurdly high level people running around killing that monster that you were about to kill because there are 500 other people running around too. You walk into an area with your party, no one else about because each area is limited only to your party.

    Another thing that makes me laugh is all the “Diablo II Fans.” When will they realise that HGL is made by exactly the same people… and that this game is supposed to go towards the same audience that doesnt want to see the Diablo style die, and the best way to do that is to have continious development, but you cant develop if theres no money to run it, and if some of these “game” players, took a day or two off their gaming schedule and got a part time job then affording $9.95 wouldnt be too hard would it. Hell, i’m a diablo II player myself, i got the expansion, and, after about a year of playing, doing the same thing over and over again just gets boring, but if paying $9.95 a month can change all that then id be more than willing for an underestimated game of this calibre.

    Play before you judge, and you’d be surprised.

  78. Oepion January 14, 2008 10:03 pm  Reply

    When you guys played D2 and exp, was was your goal?! When I was playing this game, I wanted to be a ”rich” player, have a lot of stuff to trade, lot of stuff to improve my characters. And then, I would go beat some guys in pvp games cause I was strong enough.

    What’s the matter of paying 50$( canadian ) when you cannot benefit from this shit?! Paying 120$ a year or re-install D2 and do the same things I would do in HGL?! I’d really like to play HGL because of the graphics, the improvements and all but…..if I have to pay 120$ a year, fuckoff. BTW, i’m gonna re-install D2 even if I lost my characters and all my godly runewords ( ohhh damn no more fortitude and exile!!!!)

  79. YoshiBaby February 19, 2008 12:18 pm  Reply

    Well well well..
    I find reading all of these posts to be amuesing.
    Im not running a flashy 2000$ end pc.. but i will most likely be buying this tomorrow.
    10$ a month?
    I played Diablo 2, the LOD expansion, and im a former WoW player.. never did touch GW’s though.. none the less..
    10$ is not much, guys, big whooptie doo. its also OPTIONAL.
    I applaud all of you who realise that;
    WOW. he’s got flashy armor.
    SO FREAKING WHAT?
    3 character slots isnt that terrible. if you dont like it, don’t buy it.
    Nice game, flagship.
    I’ll be buying your game soon, maybe even sub’ing.
    ^_^ <3

  80. Dingo February 19, 2008 2:28 pm  Reply

    I think the worst part about this whole thing is that to play pvp you have to PAY! Thats Garbage, that was the best part about D2, and its was all free.

  81. Dragon June 1, 2008 4:31 am  Reply

    lol i don’t care that greatly about online if your some1 like me you like the storyline of games not jsut what you can do in there you want to be thrilled, scaried, shocked and get a good laugh outer the storyline and i personally like horror/demons etc so I love it already and yeah 9.95 a months is a bit much and even with Australian dollar almost matching US dollar aussies always ending up paying more for it. and bring out a prepaid game card, because like thousands of people that will play this or want to play this online don’t want to put card numbers online even for paypal and alot of them can’t get one at there age to start with so bring in prepaid game cards and lower the price a bit.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *